@article {3217,
	title = {Two tris(3,5-disubstituted phenyl)phosphines and their isostructural PV oxides},
	journal = {Acta Crystallographica, Section E: Crystallographic Communications},
	volume = {74},
	year = {2018},
	pages = {889-894},
	abstract = {The crystal structures of tris(3,5-dimethylphenyl)phosphine (C24H27P), (I), tris(3,5-dimethylphenyl)phosphine oxide (C24H27OP), (II), tris(4-methoxy-3,5-dimethylphenyl)phosphine (C27H33O3P), (III), and tris(4-methoxy-3,5-dimethylphenyl)phosphine oxide (C27H33O4P), (IV), are reported.\&nbsp; The strucure of (III) has been described before [Romain et al. (2000). Organometallics, 19, 2047-2050], but it is rereported here on the basis of modern area-detector data and to facilitate comparison with the other structures reported here.\&nbsp; Compds. (I) and (II) crystallize isostructurally in P21/c.\&nbsp; Similarly, (III) and (IV) crystallize isostructurally in Pbca.\&nbsp; The conformations of (I) and (II) in the solid state deviate strongly from helical, whereas those of (III) and (IV) are found to be closer to an ideal threefold rotational symmetry. \&nbsp;The pyramidality indexes, ∑(C-P-C), are 305.35 (16), 317.23 (15), 307.2 (4) and 318.67 (18){\textdegree} for (I), (II), (III) and (IV), resp.\&nbsp; Each is found to be more pyramidal than Ph3P or Ph3PO.\&nbsp; Hybrid DFT calcns. incorporating terms for dispersion provide evidence that the causes of the increased pyramidality, despite the 3,5-di-Me group substitution, include dispersion interactions.\&nbsp; The calcd. ∑(C-P-C) values are 304.8{\textdegree} for both (I) and (III) and 317.4{\textdegree} for both (II) and (IV), with no difference arising from the substitution at ring position 4.},
	url = {DOI:10.1107/S2056989018007831},
	author = {Hill, NDD; Boer{\'e}, RT}
}
